tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1138570918413841323.post1873970648578222164..comments2024-02-23T03:29:54.261-05:00Comments on The Unreligious Right: Legal & NecessaryUNRRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17093711439992855042noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1138570918413841323.post-63132802528225706852009-07-18T06:05:54.431-04:002009-07-18T06:05:54.431-04:00I read it because it's a news leader and cover...I read it because it's a news leader and covers a wide range of stories. But yeah, their editorial stance has grown increasingly shrill and partisan. I don't mind left-wing ranting from a columnist like Paul Krugman, but it would be nice if the editorial board would at least keep up the pretense of professional journalism.UNRRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17093711439992855042noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1138570918413841323.post-1615850045879615002009-07-17T22:05:20.712-04:002009-07-17T22:05:20.712-04:00Rock on UNRR. I've stopped reading the Times ...Rock on UNRR. I've stopped reading the Times because of their inserted short, little diatribes in their articles stated as facts that the Bush administration was a. stupid b. evil c. wrong into their front page and general news stories. I'm like, 'what a minute, that's an opinion stated as fact and its on the front page.' It's bad when a newspaper prints such views as your aforementioned article on their editorial page, but its much worse when they let it seep into their front pages. Here's an example - check out RCP Blog Friday 'CBO disappears'Pathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10990395163682467972noreply@blogger.com