tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1138570918413841323.post2159162785374561375..comments2024-02-23T03:29:54.261-05:00Comments on The Unreligious Right: HOT5 Daily 10/28/2009UNRRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17093711439992855042noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1138570918413841323.post-84167528880059932222009-10-28T12:42:50.166-04:002009-10-28T12:42:50.166-04:00Much of the media is definitely biased. My comment...Much of the media is definitely biased. My comment was a sarcastic reference to left-wingers who whine about Fox, yet are fine with bias as long as it slants their way.UNRRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17093711439992855042noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1138570918413841323.post-27924942195930490732009-10-28T11:41:15.798-04:002009-10-28T11:41:15.798-04:00So the media isn't biased? The NY Times had t...So the media isn't biased? The NY Times had this paragraph in a front page article about Obama's $250 handout to the oldies.....<br /><br />"The checks would be part of his admirable efforts to stimulate the economy"<br /><br />I can't post the link here for some reason. Anyways, 2 signs of bias here: First off, why is the word 'admirable' in there? Clearly an opinion word and clearly showing how they view his policies and intentions. Secondly, to 'stimulate the economy' may be partly true, but if one reads elsewhere, they'll find out that this $250 handout is a way to placate nervous elderly about Obamacare. <br /><br />I clicked to read this article because it sounded like it would have been informative, but it took me just 3 paragraphs to see I was wasting my time.Pathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10990395163682467972noreply@blogger.com